Skip to content

Audit charts before they leave your desk

Judgment practice

Three charts that ask for a publication decision

Inspect the claim and chart before opening the audit. Each case uses published values in a neutral reconstruction so the evidence stays separate from the publisher’s visual identity

  1. Case 01
    020406080Benchmark A74.9Benchmark B52.8Benchmark C69.1Benchmark D30.8
    Schematic recreation · Publisher styling not reproduced

    OpenAI GPT-5 launch · Image check

    When 52.8 is drawn taller than 69.1, the labels are not enough

    Four benchmark bars use visibly incompatible visual lengths. The printed numbers and the geometry tell different rankings.

  2. Case 02
    Million metric tons80.280.781.281.780.881.8Earlier yearLater year
    Schematic recreation · Publisher styling not reproduced

    White House steel production · Image check

    The bars looked nearly 2× apart. The values were 1.24% apart

    A cropped baseline greatly amplifies a one-million-ton difference between two annual production values.

  3. Case 03
    Benchmark score50%60%70%80%72.5%74.5%Opus 4Opus 4.1
    Schematic recreation · Publisher styling not reproduced

    Anthropic Claude Opus 4.1 · Image check

    The labels say +2 points. The cropped bars tell a louder story

    Two percentages differ by two points, while a 50% baseline turns the improvement into a much larger visual jump.